Appearance
About this article
- Audience: Operators and integrators evaluating production readiness
- Goal: Understand what soak grading measures and where to find formal criteria
- Type: Concept
Summary
Ghost Protocol grades shadow deployments using automated soak gates, visual verification harnesses, and MQTT contract checks. Public docs describe the process; detailed grading rubrics and session results stay in operator-controlled repositories.
What grading covers
| Area | What passes look like |
|---|---|
| MQTT contract | Stable ~10 Hz telemetry, valid detection schema |
| Encoder / H.265 | Recent chunks without prolonged stall streaks |
| Thermal | Die temperature within soak gate thresholds |
| Storage | WARNING or better before long runs; prune if CRITICAL |
| Visual gates | Optional harness checks for playback-ready clips |
How to run grading workflows
- Complete first operator tasks
- Use the shadow orchestrator for reproducible soak batches (soaks guide)
- Interpret failures via common issues
Next steps
Operator depth
Full grading criteria, historical soak tables, and harness JSON live in private operator handoff (not published).